<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Is Free Internet Only At Cheaper Hotels?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.startertech.com/2009/10/24/why-is-free-internet-only-at-cheaper-hotels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.startertech.com/2009/10/24/why-is-free-internet-only-at-cheaper-hotels/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:36:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.startertech.com/2009/10/24/why-is-free-internet-only-at-cheaper-hotels/comment-page-1/#comment-4585</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startertech.com/?p=2342#comment-4585</guid>
		<description>The only time I usually stay in rooms that expensive are when I am traveling to a &quot;corporate&quot; event and the company is paying. Those trips do seem to be when I need to be connected the most. I have paid their dastardly fees twice but only because I could not find another free connection close. My favorite moment was at an unnamed chain hotel where they were charging a hefty price for their wireless internet yet the Starbuck&#039;s located in the lower lobby had a large sign out front advertising their &quot;free&quot; wi-fi. When I went there to use it, the employee told me they never turned it ff so I had connectivity any time of the day. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only time I usually stay in rooms that expensive are when I am traveling to a &quot;corporate&quot; event and the company is paying. Those trips do seem to be when I need to be connected the most. I have paid their dastardly fees twice but only because I could not find another free connection close. My favorite moment was at an unnamed chain hotel where they were charging a hefty price for their wireless internet yet the Starbuck&#039;s located in the lower lobby had a large sign out front advertising their &quot;free&quot; wi-fi. When I went there to use it, the employee told me they never turned it ff so I had connectivity any time of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jolene</title>
		<link>http://www.startertech.com/2009/10/24/why-is-free-internet-only-at-cheaper-hotels/comment-page-1/#comment-4556</link>
		<dc:creator>Jolene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startertech.com/?p=2342#comment-4556</guid>
		<description>Good post!  When Dan travels for work, he stays at Extended Stay Hotels (obviously since he will be there 4-5 weeks).  I haven&#039;t asked about it on this trip, but usually the internet is $5 for the 30 days.  Not sure  if its $5 for everyone (ie: shorter stays), but if he (the company) were going to fork over $300+ per night for his room, free WiFi better be included.   
 
Then again, if you can afford to pay $300+ a night for a room, what&#039;s a little extra for internet?  On second thought, with that much money I&#039;d have access via my cellphone service and wouldn&#039;t need that option.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post!  When Dan travels for work, he stays at Extended Stay Hotels (obviously since he will be there 4-5 weeks).  I haven&#039;t asked about it on this trip, but usually the internet is $5 for the 30 days.  Not sure  if its $5 for everyone (ie: shorter stays), but if he (the company) were going to fork over $300+ per night for his room, free WiFi better be included.   </p>
<p>Then again, if you can afford to pay $300+ a night for a room, what&#039;s a little extra for internet?  On second thought, with that much money I&#039;d have access via my cellphone service and wouldn&#039;t need that option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
